Real people. Real opinions.
Browse WAURE
← Advice & Questions
Education · Advice & Questions ·

How do I ask my dissertation supervisor to distinguish essential revisions from ideas for expanding the project?

Education category photographEducation

"You might also look at the earlier decade," my supervisor wrote. I added it to the list, then counted four suggestions that would each mean opening a new set of newspaper archives.

My master's history dissertation has eight weeks left. The agreed proposal covers how one local paper reported the opening and first years of a cinema. I've drafted the main chapters within that period. The new feedback may reveal that my background section is too thin, but I can't tell whether the earlier decade is necessary context or an interesting extension.

I keep replying "I'll look into that," because I don't want to seem resistant. Now my work plan contains more reading than writing, and none of the additions has a clear limit.

How can I ask which changes are essential without sounding as though I only want to do the minimum? I can bring a revised timetable. I also need to stop promising a larger dissertation than the one I can finish.

Discussion

2 community replies

'Might also' leaves room for interpretation, especially when you have replied as though every idea is a commitment. Tell the supervisor which additions you have put on the plan and ask whether that matches what they intended.

The earlier decade could be necessary if your argument depends on a change you haven't established. Could you ask which claim in the draft needs that evidence? That would help define the research task instead of treating ten more years as a new chapter by default.

Join the discussion

More in Education