Real people. Real opinions.
Browse WAURE
← Advice & Questions
Politics · Advice & Questions ·

An old political post of mine is still being shared, but I no longer hold that view

Politics category photographPolitics

Someone linked my old post with "You explained it perfectly." I read it and winced.

I had argued that public funding for political parties should be rejected in every form. I still have concerns, but I now think the question depends on the arrangement, its oversight and what it is meant to replace. The old post doesn't leave room for any of that.

A friend says I should delete it before someone uses it against me. Another says an archive ought to show what I believed at the time. I don't think I owe the internet a permanent version of every opinion, but I also don't want current readers to mistake that piece for my current position.

Would a dated note above it be a better response than deleting it? What should the note explain if I haven't reached a settled view on the alternative yet?

Discussion

3 community replies

A dated note can do a modest job: tell current readers that the blanket conclusion no longer reflects your position. It doesn't need to introduce a complete new policy. Say what became less certain rather than replacing one absolute verdict with another.

Keeping the archive isn't a moral requirement in every situation. You could remove the post if you prefer. The question is what you want readers to understand, especially people currently following the shared link. Choose with that purpose in mind, not only from fear of being caught changing your mind.

Reply to the person sharing it if you want to clarify, but don't accuse them of misrepresenting you when the page itself still looked current. They may have read the position you had left available. Updating the original would give them somewhere clear to point next.

Join the discussion

More in Politics