Stories. Questions. Different perspectives.
Browse WAURE
← Advice & Questions
Politics · Advice & Questions ·

A voting rule helped my proposal win after I criticised it last year. Should I still seek a review?

Politics category photographPolitics

Two proxy forms tipped our civic association's vote towards supporting a town-festival grant. I was relieved. Then I remembered what I'd said about proxies when they helped defeat a proposal I favoured last year.

Our written rules permit them. My earlier objection was that a proxy holder might miss arguments made during the meeting. I haven't stopped thinking that; it simply felt less urgent when the forms helped my preferred result.

A friend says reopening the rule now would undermine the decision we just made. I don't want to pretend the permitted votes were invalid or take away another member's vote after the event. I do want a rule I can defend when I lose as well as when I win.

How can I ask for a review of future voting arrangements without turning it into an attempt to rewrite this result?

Discussion

3 community replies

Be explicit that you're asking about future arrangements and acknowledge that the current vote used the association's permitted rule. Your concern about hearing the discussion can be examined without declaring the existing proxy votes invalid.

Your relief doesn't make the earlier concern disappear, but it's useful that you've noticed the change in urgency. Admit that directly. "This helped my preferred proposal, and I still think we should discuss the rule" is more credible than pretending you were equally troubled in the moment.

Include the reason members use proxies. Some may be unable to attend and still want their views counted. A review that considers only the quality of in-room discussion could ignore that cost. Ask what problem a proposed change would solve and what participation it might remove.

Join the discussion

More in Politics