My travel companion refuses guided tours, then expects me to become the guide

My friend dislikes guided tours. She says they move at the wrong pace, flatten places into rehearsed facts, and make her feel trapped behind a raised umbrella.

I understand the preference. I also enjoy knowing what I am looking at.

For this trip, I suggested one small walking tour. She said we could explore independently. I agreed, then spent two evenings building a route, checking access information, saving background reading, and arranging the stops in an order that made geographical sense.

On the day, she kept asking me questions.

Why was this building important? Which street led to the old market? Was there a story behind the monument? I answered when I knew and looked things up when I did not. By lunch, I was holding my phone in front of us and narrating a tour nobody had booked.

When I pointed this out, she laughed and said I was better than a guide because we could stop whenever we wanted. She meant it as a compliment. I heard it as a job description.

I do not need every walk to be educational. We can wander without extracting context from each corner. What I resent is rejecting the paid or structured option while expecting me to reproduce its useful parts privately.

Current tour schedules, accessibility, prices, and credentials would need verification before booking anything. The broader choice is between three honest modes: take a tour, wander without a lesson, or divide the research.

For tomorrow, I want to say I am not planning a route. I will save one place I care about, and she can choose the next. If she wants detailed context, we can use an official audio guide or book something together.

Is that fair, or am I overvaluing work I volunteered to do? How do you travel with someone who wants spontaneity but also wants another person to supply the invisible structure underneath it?