A campaign turned my skeptical question into a clip that makes me look like a supporter

I attended a candidate event because the venue was close to my apartment and the campaign advertised an open question period. I asked how the candidate would pay for a proposal without reducing another service. My wording was skeptical but not hostile. The candidate gave a polished answer, I nodded once, and the moderator moved on.

The next day the campaign posted a twelve-second video. It begins after my question. The candidate says one reassuring sentence, the camera cuts to my nod, and text on the screen reads, "Even undecided voters agree." My voice and the difficult part of the exchange are gone.

I did not sign a release that I remember, though I am not making a legal claim about recording at a public campaign event. My concern is simpler: the edit assigns me a conclusion I did not state. I remain undecided, and the answer did not resolve the tradeoff I asked about.

I emailed the campaign with the link, the approximate time of my question, and one request: remove the claim that I agreed, or replace the clip with enough context to show the question and answer accurately. I am not demanding that every event video include every word. I am asking them not to use my face as evidence for a position.

A friend thinks I should post the full story immediately and tag reporters. Another says political campaigns edit everything and I should accept that attending placed me in the background. Being visible is not the same as endorsing the caption, though.

What is a proportionate response if the campaign ignores me? Is a public correction useful, or would it only drive more attention to a clip most people would otherwise forget?