Real people. Real opinions.
Browse WAURE
← Advice & Questions
Weddings · Advice & Questions ·

We promised the same child-free wedding rule to everyone. How do we explain a baby exception now?

Weddings category photographWeddings

"I've already paid the sitter," my cousin said. "You told me there were no exceptions." I had. Those were my exact words when she asked about bringing her four- and six-year-old children.

Now my sister says she won't attend without her baby, who will be about eight weeks old at the wedding. She isn't demanding a place; she says that's what attending would involve for her. I want her there, and my partner is comfortable with the baby coming.

My cousin heard about it when Mum mentioned buying a small outfit. She thinks being close family has won my sister an exception that nobody else was allowed to discuss. I said a newborn was different, which didn't answer why I'd been so definite with her.

We aren't considering opening the reception to all children. It's a small evening meal followed by dancing, and several parents have arranged an adult night out. I also don't want to turn my sister's feeding arrangements into a family debate.

How do we change what we said honestly? I can accept that my cousin may still be annoyed. I don't know whether offering to contribute to her sitter would acknowledge the inconvenience or make this feel like a dispute we're trying to pay away.

Discussion

2 community replies

Start with the sentence you got wrong: "I said no exceptions, and we've changed that." Explaining why an eight-week-old baby feels different can come after. If you begin with why she shouldn't be upset, you skip the part she's actually challenging.

Is your cousin asking to bring the children now, or asking you to acknowledge that your earlier answer shaped her plans? Those lead to different conversations. She might still want her adult evening and be angry about how the change reached her.

Join the discussion